IBA

INTRODUCTION

In order to meet its compliance obligations under:

The CBN Code of Corporate Governance for Other Financial Institutions in Nigeria, 2018 and
The FRCN Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance, 2018

Baobab MFB has initiated this independent assessment of its Board and all Directors.

In pursuit of this exercise an independent consultant (DataPro Limited) has been engaged to conduct both a general Board Assessment and the Peer review of members.

The General Assessment shall benchmark Baobab MFB Board of Directors against established and best practices and principles of the Code of Corporate Governance using attached Form IBA¹.
A Peer review assessment of members by themselves shall be conducted using established criteria and rating system as detailed in form IBA²
Form IBA²is divided into two (2) parts:

Part 1 is to enable a board member provide relevant information and/or details regarding other members of the board.
Part II is to enable a board member provide relevant information and/or details concerning board committees where he/she served during the immediate past financial year and/or other committees of the board.

All completed Form IBA² shall be submitted to DataPro who shall consolidate, compute the average rating and present the result.
The Final Board Review Assessment report shall be derived from both the General Assessment and the individual Directors Peer

PART 1

SECTION A

A. Committee Activity (15%) Razack Adeyemi Adeola

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

Strong Adequate Needs improvement

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

Strong Adequate Needs improvement

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

Strong Adequate Needs improvement

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

Strong Adequate Needs improvement

A. Committee Activity (15%) Tokunboh Ishmael

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

A. Committee Activity (15%) Philip Sigwart

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

Strong Adequate Needs Improvement

A. Committee Activity (15%) Kazeem Olanrewaju

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

A. Committee Activity (15%) Rotimi Oyekanmi

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

A. Committee Activity (15%) Frédéric Flejou

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

A. Committee Activity (15%) Oyinkansade Adewale

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

A. Committee Activity (15%) Christiana Reifsheider

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Knowledge and ability to assess bank’s strategy, business plans, management and other key issues

2. Understanding of the long-term economic mission of the bank and its social accountability.

3. Ability to communicate thoughts, ideas and opinions on issues being discussed.

4. Ability to draw from relevant experience to address issues faced by the bank.

SECTION B

B. Independence (15%) Razack Adeyemi Adeola

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Tokunboh Ishmael

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

B. Independence (15%) Tokunboh Ishmael

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Philip Sigwart

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Kazeem Olanrewaju

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Rotimi Oyekanmi

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Frédéric Flejou

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Oyinkansade Adewale

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

B. Independence (15%) Christiana Reifsheider

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Demonstrates no conflict of interest on issues confronting the bank.

2. Ability to speak up on critical matters requiring objective opinion even if his views differ from others

3. Works well with other members while not necessarily always agreeing.

4. Ability to listen with an open mind and be sensitive to other opinions without compromising independent position.

5. Supportive of a reasonable and independent directorate.

6. Demonstrates integrity and high ethical standards.

SECTION C

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Razack Adeyemi Adeola

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities:

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Tokunboh Ishmael

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities.

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Philip Sigwart

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities.

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Kazeem Olanrewaju

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities.

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Rotimi Oyekanmi

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities.

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Frédéric Flejou

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Oyinkansade Adewale

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings.

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities.

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

C. Preparedness as a Director (20%) Christiana Reifsheider

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Understands his role as director and functions of the Board vs Management

2. Manifests full knowledge of facts and issues on matters being deliberated during Board and Committee meetings.

3. Spends extra time with Chairman and CEO on relevant issues pertaining to the Bank

4. Familiarity with management and Bank facilities.

a. Knows the key officers and managers of the Bank
b. Visits facilities/officers

5. Manifests knowledge of the Bank’s history. Philosophy, style and strategic plans.

SECTION D

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Razack Adeyemi Adeola

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues.

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management.

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Tokunboh Ishmael

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues.

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management.

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Philip Sigwart

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues.

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management.

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Kazeem Olanrewaju

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management.

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Rotimi Oyekanmi

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Frédéric Flejou

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management.

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Oyinkansade Adewale

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues.

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member.

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

D. Practice as a Director (20%) Christiana Reifsheider

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Ability to ask appropriate questions of management so as to add value and encourage discussions of key issues.

2. Attendance in all Board and Committee meeting of which he/she is a member

3. Understanding of the difference between governance responsibilities and day-to-day management.

4. Ability to work effectively and constructively with Board colleagues and Management and to work as a team player.

5. Confidence and willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion.

6. Ability to actively participate in decision making and willingness to make tough decisions.

SECTION E

E. Committee Activity (15%) Razack Adeyemi Adeola

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Manifests interest to participate as member of the committee when nominated/appointed.

2. Understanding the process of committee work, particularly its relations with executive management

3. Diligent and faithful in attending committee meetings of which he/she is a member.

E. Committee Activity (15%) Tokunboh Ishmael

The Individual director’s peer review should be completed, bearing in mind the following.

1.
Strong = Ability to demonstrate excellent levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Adequate = Ability to demonstrate effective levels of skills, performance, contributions etc
Needs Improvement = Ability to demonstrate minimal levels of skills, performance, contributions etc

2.
Strong: Score between 10.1 - 15
Adequate: Score between 5.1 - 10
Needs Improvement: Score below 5

Enter score below

1. Manifests interest to participate as member of the committee when nominated/appointed

2. Understanding the process of committee work, particularly its relations with executive management

3. Diligent and faithful in attending committee meetings of which he/she is a member.

1. Manifests interest to participate as member of the committee when nominated/appointed

2. Understanding the process of committee work, particularly its relations with executive management

3. Diligent and faithful in attending committee meetings of which he/she is a member.

1. Manifests interest to participate as member of the committee when nominated/appointed.

2. Understanding the process of committee work, particularly its relations with executive management

3. Diligent and faithful in attending committee meetings of which he/she is a member

1. Manifests interest to participate as member of the committee when nominated/appointed

2. Understanding the process of committee work, particularly its relations with executive management.